Cybernetics And Systems Analysis logo
Editorial Board Announcements Abstracts Authors Archive
Cybernetics And Systems Analysis
International Theoretical Science Journal
Volume 56 >>> № 2 MARCH — APRIL 2020
UDC 519.816
M.M. Potomkin1, O.V. Dublian2, R.B. Khomchak3


1 Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces
of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

 favorite_p@ukr.net

2 Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

 dov@mil.gov.ua

3 Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

 homchak@i.ua

DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOLVING MULTICRITERIA PROBLEMS
IN THE ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Abstract. The paper describes a decision-making support system for solving multi-criteria problems during the analysis of complex systems, in the case where a finite set of alternatives whose characteristics are given in tabular form is considered. It is based on the analysis of the phasing of such studies whose results determine the requirements for the types of problems to be solved with its use and the list of methods that are expedient to implement The considered decision-making support system is designed to solve problems under certainty, as well as stochastic and non-stochastic uncertainty. In accordance with the main stages of the analysis of complex systems, it implements a number of multi-criteria methods that allow to assess relationships between the factors associated with its operation, determine the importance of the indicators that characterize it, generate a priority series of the considered alternatives, or form the kernel of alternatives that are promising for further research.

Keywords: alternative, multi-criteria decision making, kernel generation method, ranking method.



FULL TEXT

REFERENCES

  1. Vassilev V., Staykov B., Andonov F., Genova K., Vassileva M. Multicriteria decision support system MOLIP. Cybernetics and Information Technologies. 2002. N 1. P. 3–15.

  2. Yatsalo B.I., Gritsyuk S.V., Didenko V.I., Mirzeabasov O.A. Multi-criteria decision analysis system and its practical application. Software Products and Systems. 2014. N 2. P. 75–85.

  3. Andreichikov A.V., Decatov D.E., Kremenov S.I. Analysis of the competitiveness of computer companies based on an automated decision support system. Vestn. Volgogr. Univ, Ser. 3: "Econ. Ecol. ". 2010. N 1 (16). P. 5–12.

  4. Songsangyos P. The decision support system for hierarchical portfolio management. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2014. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 328–331.

  5. Baizyldayeva U., Vlasov O., Kuandykov A.A. , Akhmetov T.B. Multi-criteria decision support systems. Comparative analysis. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013. Vol. 16, N 12. P. 1725–1730.

  6. Hatami-Marbini A., Tavana M., Moradi M., Kangi F. A fuzzy group Electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Safety Science. 2013. Vol. 51, N 1. Р. 414–426.

  7. Blyumin S.L., Shuikova I.A. Models and decision-making methods under uncertainty [in Russian]. Lipetsk: LEGI, 2001. 138 p.

  8. Us S.A. Decision-making methods [in Ukrainian]. Donetsk: Nats. hirnychyy un-t, 2012. 212 p.

  9. Sen H., Demiral M.F. Hospital location selection with grey system theory. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies. 2016. Vol. 2, Iss. 2. Р. 66–79.

  10. Plokhotnikov K.E., Kolkov S.V. Statistics: textbook [in Russian]. Moscow: FLINTA, 2012. 288 p.

  11. Dursun M., Sener Z. An integrated DEMATEL-QFD model for medical supplier selection. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering. 2014. Vol. 8, N 3. Р. 586–590.

  12. Saati T., Kearns K. Analytical planning. Organization of systems [Russian translation]. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 1991. 224 p.

  13. Cereska A., Podvezko V., Zavadskas E. K. Operating characteristics analysis of rotor systems using MCDM methods. Studies in Informatics and Control. 2016. Vol. 25, N 1. P. 59–68.

  14. Zagorka O.M., Mosov S.P., Sbitnev A.I., Stuzhuk P.I. Elements of the theory of complex military systems [in Ukrainian]. Kyiv: NAOU, 2005. 100 p.

  15. Vujicic M.D., Papic M.Z., Blagojevic M.D. Comparative analysis of objective techniques for criteria weighing in two MCDM methods on example of an air conditioner selection. TEHNIKA — MENADZMENT. 2017. Vol. 67, N 3. P. 422–429.

  16. Chernorutsky I.G. Decision Making Methods [in Russian]. SPB: BHV-Petersburg, 2005. 408 p.

  17. Potomkin M.M., Svida I.Yu. Multi-criteria decision-making based on the use of multiple optimization methods. Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz. 2018. Vol. 54, N 4. P. 91–97.

  18. Potomkin M.M. Evaluating the validity of multi-criteria decision making. Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz. 2018. Vol. 54, N 6. P. 89–95.
Editorial Board Announcements Abstracts Authors Archive
about scope office editorial board instructions for authors subscriptions contacts
© 2020 Kibernetika.org. All rights reserved.