Cybernetics And Systems Analysis logo
Editorial Board Announcements Abstracts Authors Archive
Cybernetics And Systems Analysis
International Theoretical Science Journal
UDC 519.86: 51.77: 330.5.057.7: 336
O. Yastremskii1


1 Academy of Financial Management, Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

yast2005@ukr.net

INPUT–OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY–COST ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMY OF UKRAINE:
SELECTED CROSS-COUNTRIES AND INTERTEMPORAL COMPARISON

Abstract. The paper studies input–output analysis of the productivity and cost of Ukraine’s industries. A classification in the space ‘productivity – cost’ of the industries is proposed. The paper reflects computation results on real data. Descriptive statistics of productivity, cost indexes is presented. Selected cross-countries and intertemporal comparison is discussed.

Keywords: input–output scheme, key industries, productive industries, comparative analysis, direct requirements, total requirements.



FULL TEXT

REFERENCES

  1. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017/World Economic Forum. URL: http://www3. weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2016-2017_ FINAL.pdf. [Accessed 02 August 2017].

  2. Rasmussen P.N. Studies in inter-sectoral relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1956.

  3. Leontief W.W. The Structure of american economy, 1919–1939: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1951. 282 p.

  4. Horowitz K.J., Planting M.A. Concepts and methods of the input-output accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce. 2006, updated 2009 – 1-206 pp.

  5. Gurgul H., Majdosz P. Key sector analysis: A case of the transited Polish economy. Managing Global Transitions. 2005. Vol. 3, N 1. Р. 35–111. URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/ 1581-6311/3_095-111.pdf.

  6. Umed Temursho. Backward and forward linkages and key sectors in the Kazakhstan economy (Final report). Joint Government of Kazakhstan and Asian development bank knowledge and experience exchange program. 2016. 74 p. URL: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/ 47110/47110-001-dpta-en_2.pdf [Accessed 21 January 2019].

  7. Humavindu M.N., Stage J. Key sectors of the namibian tconomy. Journal of Economic Structures. 2013. Vol. 2, Іss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-1.

  8. Morioka R., Nansai K., Tsuda K. Role of linkage structures in supply chain for managing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Structurе. 2018. Vol. 7, Iss.7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008- 018-0105-3.

  9. Implementing the new methodology for product market and sector monitoring: Results of a first sector screening: Commission Staff Working Document (Commission of the European Communities). Brussels, 20.11.2007.

  10. Ogarenko I., Hubacek K. Eliminating indirect energy subsidies in Ukraine: Estimation of environmental and socioeconomic effects using input–output modeling. Journal of Economic Structures. 2013. Vol. 2, Iss. 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-7.

  11. Yastremskii O.I. Key and effective types of economic activity in Ukraine. Bulletin of Economic Science of Ukraine. 2018. N. 2. P. 177–182. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Venu_2018_2_33.

  12. Yastremskii OI Types of economic activity "Education," "Research and development" in the structure of the national economy of Ukraine. Educational analytics of Ukraine. 2019. N 1(5). P. 20–30.

  13. Nikaido H. Convex structures and economic theory. Ser. Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Vol. 51. Bellman R. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1968. 422 p.

  14. Table "costs-output" in basic prices for 2017. State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2019. URL: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/05/zb_tvvuoz2017pdf.pdf.

  15. National accounts of Ukraine for 2017. Statistical collection. State Statistics Service, 2019. P. 130–141.

  16. Glushkov V.M. DISPLAN - a new planning technology. Upravlyayushchiye sistemy i mashiny. 1980. N 6. P. 5–10.

  17. Yastremskii O.I. Intersectoral chessboard of uncertainty and its application: forecasting, economic policy, fiscal risk, general equilibrium. Kibernetika i systemnyj analiz. 2019. Vol. 55, N 1. P. 28–36.

  18. Cost–output table in consumer prices for 2005 under the expanded program. State Statistics Service, 2009. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2009/vvp/an_tvv/ IOT05exp.rar; http://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2009/vvp/an_tvv/IOT05exp.rar.

  19. Glushkova V.V., Karpets E.P. Improving forecasting methods as a development of DISPLAN ideas. OGAS. 2015. URL: http://ogas.kiev.ua/library/sovershenstvovanye-metodov-prog nozyrovanyya-kak-razvytye-ydej-dysplana-799/.

  20. Input–output table at basic prices in 2010. Statistics Poland. 2019. URL: https://stat.gov.pl/download/ gfx/portalinformacyjny/en/defaultaktualnosci/3300/5/2/1/input_output_table_basic_ prices_2010.xls.

  21. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Input-Output Accounts Data. Commodities by commodities /After Redefinitions/Producer Value – Commodities by commodities, 1997–2018: 17 Commodities. URL: https://www.bea.gov/industry/io_annual.htm.

  22. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Industry Data. Interactive Access to Industry Economic Accounts Data: Input-Output. The use of commodities by industries. BEA. URL: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&step=102&isuri=1&table_list=4&aggregation=sum.

  23. The use of commodities by industries. BEA. URL: https://apps.bea.gov/industry/xls/io-annual/Use_ SUT_Framework_2007_2012_DET.xlsx.

  24. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2017. IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx. URL: apps.bea.gov/industry/xls/io-annual/IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx [Accessed 19 May 2019].

  25. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2019. Table “Commodity-by-commodity Total Requirements, After Redefinitions, Summary level, 1997–2018”. URL: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&step=102&isuri=1&table_list=9&aggregation=sum.
© 2020 Kibernetika.org. All rights reserved.