UDC 519.816
1 Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
 favorite_p@ukr.net
|
2 Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
saa66ua@ukr.net
|
3 Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
davdoma@gmail.com
|
4 Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
zvarych_ao@ukr.net
|
COMPREHENSIVE USE OF THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AND THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY
PROCESS TO INCREASE THE SUBSTANTIATION OF ALTERNATIVE RANKING RESULTS
Abstract. The article provides a general description of the analytic hierarchy process and analyzes the problem of the influence of Pareto-inefficient alternatives on ranking results. It is shown that the presence of Pareto-inefficient alternatives in the original set can lead to erroneous ranking, and the lack of a mechanism within the framework of the analytic hierarchy process that confirms or disproves the existence of such alternatives decreases the level of validity of the obtained results. An approach to the integrated use of the Pareto principle and the analytic hierarchy process is proposed. The possibility of its practical application is shown on a specific example of calculations. The use of this approach will increase the validity of the ranking results of alternatives by either eliminating Pareto-ineffective ones from consideration, or confirming their absence.
Keywords: analytic hierarchy process, expert survey, rank reversal effect, Pareto principle, Pareto efficiency, Pareto inefficiency.
FULL TEXT
REFERENCES
- Saati T., Kearns K. Analytical planning. Organization of systems [in Russian]. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 1991. 224 p.
- Zagorka O.M., Mosov S.P., Sbitnev A.I., Stuzhuk P.I. Elements of research of complex systems of military purpose [in Ukrainian]. Kyiv: NAOU, 2005. 100 p.
- Aruldoss M., Lakshmi T.M., Venkatesan V.P. A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems. 2013. Vol. 1, N 1. Р. 31–43.
- Moghaddam N.B., Nasiri M., Mousavi S.M. An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue. Int. Journal Environ. Sci. Tech. 2011. N 8 (3). Р. 605–620.
- Mironova N.A. Integration of modifications of the hierarchy analysis method for group decision support systems. Radíoyelektroníka, ínformatika, upravlínnya. 2011. N 2. P. 47–54.
- Latypova V.A. On the application of approximate calculation methods in the method of hierarchy analysis. Online magazine "Science of Science". 2017. Vol. 9, N 6. URL: https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/ 146TVN617.pdf.
- Nogin V.D. Decision making under many criteria [in Russian]. SPb .: Yutas, 2007. 104 p.
- Nedashkivska N.I. Estimation of rank reversal in the method of hierarchy analysis. Systemni doslidzhennya ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi. 2005. N 4. P. 120–130.
- Lotov A.V., Pospelov I.I. Multi-criteria decision-making problems [in Russian]. Moscow: MAX Press, 2008. 197 p.
- Sarraf A.Z., Mohaghar A., Bazargani H. Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2013. Vol. 6, N 4. Р. 860–875.
- El-Santawy M.F. A VIKOR method for solving personnel training selection problem. International Journal of Computing Science. 2012. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 9–12.
- Sen H., Demiral M.F. Hospital location selection with Grey System Theory. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies. 2016. Vol. 2, N 2. Р. 66–79.
- Korneenko V.P. Optimization methods. Moscow: Vysch. shk., 2007. 664 p.
- Kardash A.S., Vince A.A., Bazhenov R.I. On the optimal choice of a tablet computer for a primary school student. Sovrem. tekhn. i tekh. 2014. N 10. URL: http:// technology.snauka.ru/2014/10/4712.
