UDC 621.391

CLASSIFICATION OF SIGNALS WITH DIGITAL PARAMETER MODULATION
USING SG-STATISTICS

REFERENCES

• 1. Rembovsky A.M., Ashikhmin A.V., Kozmin V.A. Radio Monitoring: Tasks, Methods, Tools. 4th ed. corrected [in Russian]. Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya – Telecom, 2015. 640 c.


• 2. Perunov Yu.M., Kupriyanov A.I. Methods and techniques of electronic warfare [in Russian]. Moscow: Infra-Engineering, 2021. 376 p.


• 3. Sergienko A.B. Digital Communications [in Russian]. SPb: ETU "LETI", 2012. 164 p.


• 4. Shermeh A.E., Ghazalian R. Recognition of communication signal types using genetic algorithm and support vector machines based on the higher order statistics. Digital Signal. Proc. 2010. Vol. 20, N 6. P. 1748–1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/.


• 5. Hossen A., Al-Wadahi F., Jervase J.A. Classification of modulation signals using statistical signal characterization and artificial neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2007. Vol. 20, N 4. P. 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/.


• 6. Hassan K., Dayoub I., Hamouda W., Berbineau M. Automatic modulation recognition using wavelet transform and neural networks in wireless systems. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2010. Vol. 2010, N 1. Article number 532898. https://doi.org/10.1155/.


• 7. Velampalli C. Hierarchical blind modulation classification in the presence of carrier frequency offset. Master’s Thesis. Hyderabad: Communications Research Center, 2010. P. 1–39.


• 8. Su W., Kosinski J.A. Higher-order blind signal feature separation: An enabling technology for battlefield awareness. U. S. Army CECOM Research Development and Engineering Center, 2006. 7 p.


• 9. Kozminchuk B.W., Huang X. Joint blind synchronization of M-PSK and M-QAM signals. Defense Research Establishment. Ottawa, 1996. 13 p.


• 10. Boiteau D., Le Martret C. Combinaison de moments d’ordre 2 et 4 pour la classification de modulations linБaires. Seizieme Colloque GRETSI. 1997. Р. 981–984.


• 11. Swami A., Sadler B.M. Hierarchical digital modulation classification using cumulants. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 2000. Vol. 48, N. 3. P. 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ 26.837045.


• 12. Li J., Wang J., Fan X., and Zhang Y. Automatic digital modulation recognition using feature subset selection. PIERS Proceedings (March 24–28, 2008, Hangzhou, China). 2008. Part 1. P. 351–354.


• 13. Kurbanaliev V. K. Cumulative signs for determining the type of signal manipulation. Radio electronics. Nanosystems. Information technologies. 2020. Vol. 12, N 3. P. 319–328. https://doi.org/10.17725/.


• 14. Nagornyuk O.A. Using cumulative analysis for recognition of radio signals of digital telecommunication systems. Systemy obrobky informatsiyi. 2018. N 2(153). P. 136–143. https://doi.org/10.30748/.


• 15. Nagornyuk O.A., Pysarchuk O.O., Manoilov V.P. A method of automated recognition of the type of digital linear modulation based on cumulative signal analysis. Bulletin of the ZhDTU. Ser. "Technical Sciences" 2013. Vol. 2 (65). P. 67–76. https://doi.org/10.26642.


• 16. Gaikwad C.J., Samdani H.K., Sircar P. Signal parameter estimation using fourth order statistics: multiplicative and additive noise environment. SpringerPlus. 2015. Vol. 4, Article number 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/.


• 17. Savit R., Green M.. Time series and dependent variables. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1991. Vol. 50, N 1. P. 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/.


• 18. Kostenko P.Yu., Slobodyanyuk V.V., Alyonkin M.I., Shapovalov O.V. Application of the predictability index to estimate the signal delay time under conditions of multiplicative interference with unknown probability distribution density. Collection of scientific papers of the Kharkiv National University of the Air Force. 2024. Т 1(79). З. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.30748/.


• 19. Guven G. Testing equality of means in one-way ANOVA using three and four moment approximations. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara. Ser. A1 Mathematics and Statistics. 2023. Vol. 72, N 3. P. 587–605. https://doi.org/10.31801/.