DOI
10.34229/KCA2522-9664.26.3.10
UDC 519.816
M.М. Potomkin
Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine,
favorite_p@ukr.net
О.М. Semenenko
Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine, Olehsemenenko9@gmail.com
Yu.O. Kliat
Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine, kliatyuriiol@ukr.net
A.А. Sedliar
Central Scientific and Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine, saa66ua@ukr.net
A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR FORMING THE CORE OF ALTERNATIVES
BASED ON THE EUCLIDEAN CONVOLUTION
Abstract. It is noted that core-formation methods ensure a reduction in the number of alternatives subject to comparison and enhance the validity of their subsequent ranking. A description of the tri-criteria Euclidean core method is provided, on the basis of which a comprehensive method for forming the core of alternatives has been developed. This method makes it possible to generate four cores using different combinations of comparison criteria within a single algorithm. The feasibility of the practical application of the proposed method is demonstrated through a calculation example. In addition, it is confirmed that the presence of Pareto-inefficient alternatives within the initial set may influence the results obtained.
Keywords: multicriteria method, Pareto method, tri-criteria Euclidean core method, calculation example, formation of the core of alternatives.
full text
REFERENCES
- 1. Decision-making theory: a textbook for students of specialty 126 "Information systems and technologies" and specialty 121 "Software engineering". Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute. Compiled by: O.S. Zhurakovska. Electronic text data (1 file: 2.7 MB). Kyiv: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 2020. 99 p. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/items/9ff6966d-6cab-482e-8981-556cf69a728a.
- 2. Zagorka O.M., Mosov S.P., Sbytnev A.I., Stuzhuk P.I. Elements of research of complex military systems. Kyiv: NAOU, 2005. 100 p.
- 3. Taherdoost H., Madanchian M. A comprehensive overview of the ELECTRE method in multi criteria decision-making. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research. 2023. Vol. 6, Iss. 2. P. 5–16. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i2.5637.
- 4. Uysal H.T., Yavuz K. Selection of logistics centre location via ELECTRE method: a case study in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2014. Vol. 5, N 9. Р. 276–289. URL: https:// ijbss.thebrpi.org/journals/Vol_5_No_9_August_2014/32.pdf.
- 5. Potomkin M.M., Sirchenko R.S. The method of three-criteria Euclidean kernel and its use for multi-criteria comparison of alternatives. Science and Technology of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 2018. No. 1 (30). Pp. 138–142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 337461418_Metod_trikriterialnogo_evklidovogo_ranzuvanna_ta_jogo_vikoristanna_dla_ bagatokriterialnogo_porivnanna_alternativ.
- 6. Tofallis C. Add or multiply? A tutorial on ranking and choosing with multiple criteria. INFORMS Transactions on Education. 2014. Vol. 14, N 3. Р. 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2013.0124.
- 7. TOPSIS method for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). URL: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/machine-learning/topsis-method-for-multiple-criteria-decision-making-mcdm/.
- 8. Barbara F., Moreira M.В.L., Fбvero L.P., dos Santos M. Interactive internet-based tool proposal for the WASPAS method: a contribution for decision-making process. Procedia Computer Science. 2023. Vol. 221. P. 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.028.
- 9. Yazdani M., Graeml F.R. VIKOR and its applications: A state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences. 2014. Vol. 5, Iss. 2. P. 56–83.https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsds.2014040105.
- 10. Lourenzutti R., Krohling R.A. TODIM based method to process heterogeneous information. Procedia Computer Science. 2015. Vol. 55. P. 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.056.
- 11. Voronin A.N., Savchenko A.S. Finding compromise and consensus in multicriteria problems. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2022. Vol. 58, N 5. P. 780–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-022-00511-9.
- 12. Voronin A.N., Savchenko A.S. A systematic approach to multiobjective optimization. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2020. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00320-y.
