Cybernetics And Systems Analysis logo
Editorial Board Announcements Abstracts Authors Archive
Cybernetics And Systems Analysis
International Theoretical Science Journal
Volume 57 >>> № 3 MAY — JUNE 2021
-->

UDC 519.86 : 51.77 : 330.5.057.7 : 336
O. Yastremskii1, V. Kulyk2


1 Academy of Financial Management, Ministry of Finance
of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

2 Academy of Financial Management, Ministry of Finance
of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

 volodymyr_kulyk@ukr.net

INPUT-OUTPUT MAP OF UNCERTAINTY OF THE ECONOMY OF UKRAINE
AND ITS APPLICATION

Abstract. The methodology for calculating the inter-industry map of uncertainty of the Ukrainian economy and the results of calculations are considered.A historical assessment of a fragment of fiscal risks associated with tax revenues from taxes on products and other production taxes is carried out. The sectors of Ukraine’s economy are classified through the prism of the uncertainty map. It is proposed to use the production portfolio of economic activities as a tool to mitigate fiscal risk.

Keywords: input-output scheme, types of economic activity, historical statistical analysis of input-output tables, fiscal risk, portfolio of production, volatility with decaying memory.



FULL TEXT

REFERENCES

  1. Horowitz K., Planting M. Concepts and methods of the U.S. input-output accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce, 2009. 206 p. https://www.bea.gov/sites/ default/files/methodologies/IOmanual_092906.pdf.

  2. Glushkov V.M. DISPLAN is a new planning technology. Upravl. sist. i mash. 1980. N 6. P. 5–10.

  3. Karpets E.P., Glushkova V.V. On the possibility of using the DISPLAN system for balanced economic management. In the book: Cybernetics and Democratic Economic Management (edited by A.V. Kravchuk). Kiev: Center for Social and Labor Research, 2017. P. 45–56.

  4. Matveev M.T., Arkhangelskiy Yu.S., Rybalchenko V.P. et al. Models of the automated system of planned calculations of the State Planning Committee of the Republic [in Russian]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1988. 239 p.

  5. Ermoliev Yu.M., Yastremskii A.I. Stochastic models and methods in economic planning [in Russian]. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. 256 p.

  6. Yastremskii O.I. Economic risk modeling [in Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Lybid, 1992. 176 p.

  7. Gurgul H. Stochastic input-output modeling. Ekonomia Menedzerska. 2007. N 2. P. 57–70.

  8. Temursho U. Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis. In: Handbook of input-output analyses. 2017. P. 407–463. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476329.00018.

  9. Yastremskii O.I. Intersectoral uncertainty chessboard and its application: forecasting, economic policy, fiscal risk, general equilibrium. Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz. 2019. Vol. 55, N 3. P. 28–36.

  10. U.S. Bureau of Economic analysis. IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx. [Online]. 2017. URL: apps.bea.gov/industry/xls/io-annual/ IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx (Last accessed: 09 June 2020 p.).

  11. Markovits G. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance. 1952. Vol. 7, Iss. 1. P. 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.

  12. Tables "cost-output" of Ukraine for 2000-2017 in basic prices. Statistical collections. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2002-2019 рр. URL: www.ukrstat.gov.ua.

  13. Methodological provisions for the organization of state statistical observation Table "costs-output". State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Kyiv, 2018. 46 p.

  14. National accounts statistics: Main aggregates and detailed tables, 2018. Part I–V. New York: United Nations, 2019. 4772 p.

  15. European system of accounts – ESA 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Offce of the European Union, 2013. 652 p.

  16. Yastremsky O.I., Kulik V.V. Volatility of the structure of intersectoral relations of the Ukrainian economy. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannya. 2020. N 2. P. 61–79.

  17. Kopits G. Coping with fiscal risk: Analysis and practice. OECD Journal on Budgeting. 2014. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jxrgssdqnlt.

  18. Rockafellar R.T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditionalvalue-at-risk. Journal of Risk. 2000. Vol. 2, N 3. P. 21–41. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2000.038.

  19. Rasmussen P.N. Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1956. 217 c.

  20. Gurgul H., Majdosz P. Key sector analysis: a case of the transited polish economy. Managing Global Transitions. 2005. Vol. 3, N 1. P. 95–111. URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1581-6311/ 3_095-111.pdf.

  21. Temursho U. Backward and forward linkages and key sectors in the Kazakhstan economy (Final report). Joint government of Kazakhstan and Asian development bank knowledge and experience exchange program. 2016. URL: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ project-documents/47110/ 47110-001-dpta-en_2.pdf.

  22. Humavindu M.N., Stage J. Key sectors of the Namibian economy. Journal of Economic Structures. 2013. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-1.

  23. Yastremskii O.I. Intersectoral analysis of cost and productivity of Ukraine's economy: a comparison over time and between countries. Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz. 2020. Vol. 56, N 4. P. 85–97.




Editorial Board Announcements Abstracts Authors Archive
about scope office editorial board instructions for authors subscriptions contacts
© 2021 Kibernetika.org. All rights reserved.